You don’t get a “pass” to discriminate against people with disabilities in an emergency
People with disabilities are the ones guaranteed to get disproportionately ****ed over in any type of emergency
Photo by Matthew Henry on Unsplash
At 2 pm yesterday, I got the expected call from PG&E notifying me of an impending power outage at 8 pm. In their long list of recorded instructions, someone reading from a script casually mentioned the need for cash (no socio-economic privilege showing there?!?!?). But I let that slide, charged all my devices, and waited.
My power went out at 8 pm, as expected. We have a generator. After experiencing 8–10 power outages a year, some of which lasted several days, we agreed that a generator would be a more practical purchase than an engagement ring. The generator keeps my refrigerator containing $3000 worth of injectable medicine running, the coffee maker and microwave going, and the internet operational. I had deliberately left my wheelchair charger at work, which was not supposed to experience a power outage…
…and then I checked the new PG&E website for an update.
You see, PG&E hadn’t planned that 800,000 people who were TOLD in the robocall to check the pge.com website for more details would do so. And the site crashed repeatedly. So they set up a new one. But despite PG&E’s “commitment to accessibility,” where they cheerfully state that they follow the international standard known as WCAG 2.0 Level AA, the information on the new site proved that they weren’t following that standard there and wasn’t accessible in the least to people with disabilities who use assistive technology.
This isn’t the first time PG&E has harmed people with disabilities in blatant disregard for their health and safety. All you need to do is take the quickest of glances at the Paradise Fire victim list. Seventy-five percent of the people who died were either over the age of 65 (and thus more prone to having a disability) or were younger people who were wheelchair users or who had other disabilities that presented an additional challenge in evacuating.
People with disabilities are more likely to die in natural disasters/emergencies
This has been known anecdotally for a long time, but Hurricane Katrina is a well-studied natural disaster that documented this. According to the AARP, seventy-three percent of Hurricane Katrina-related deaths in the New Orleans area were among persons aged 60 and over. However, they comprised only 15 percent of the New Orleans population. Senate testimony not focused on a single disaster recently stated that people with disabilities are 2 to 4 times more likely to die or sustain a critical injury during a disaster than people without disabilities. Reasons cited include:
pre-existing medical condition(s) reliance on electricity (refrigeration, oxygen, durable medical equipment)
transportation issues preventing their evacuation from homes, nursing homes, or hospitals because they lacked accessible public transportation or other requisite assistance
lack of access to emergency announcements, which included:
Not owning the proper devices (TV/cell phone/radio)
Emergency announcements are inaccessible (No ASL interpreters or captions for TV, web pages not working with screen readers)
People with sensory issues cannot stand the blaring of the emergency alarms associated with the notices.
Not surprisingly, the total of people who died as a result of Hurricane Maria *after* the hurricane had passed was higher than the original death toll. 10 % of the “excess deaths,” or around 450 lives, were snuffed out due to “respiratory problems secondary to power outages.”
People with disabilities are rarely included or considered in disaster planning.
I experience this myself at work, where I have been excluded from evacuation planning and have no reliable plan other than my coworkers picking me up and carrying me downstairs in an emergency. Disaster planning for people with disabilities is NOT THE SAME as disaster planning for people without disabilities. If you don’t take disabilities into account, you are guaranteed to fail and contribute to that higher death rate.
People with disabilities are more likely to live in poverty.
It is well known that people with disabilities are more likely to be in poverty, which is directly connected with their inability to work or a desire to work but the inability to obtain a job. Unpackaging that sentence is a whole separate article. In 2014, poverty rates were 12% for those without a disability but a staggering 29% for those with a disability.
It probably goes without saying that if you struggle to have enough money to eat, buy your medicine, and pay the rent, you don’t have enough for luxuries like emergency kits, redundant sets of equipment, or having cash on hand when credit card machines are down.
People with disabilities are more likely to have animals that complicate evacuation
Many articles tout the health benefits of having a pet. It is also well documented that people with disabilities over-index on spending money on pets who might be either service animals or pets to help combat the loneliness associated with having a disability. But pets are an additional evacuation complication.
Pets/service animals may take up space that could be used for another person.
If you have multiple pets on the same bus, they might fight (service animals have been specifically trained not to engage with other animals).
Someone on the bus may have allergies or asthma caused by a pet/service animal.
This was preventable. PG&E dropped the ball AGAIN. It sends a “we don’t care if you live or die” message when you put up emergency information that your customers with disabilities can’t access.
We all deserve better from our public utilities.
And now, I will go home, wait for my power to go back on, print out this Article, and attach it to my Public Utilities Commission complaint.